🔗 Share this article

Government papers reveal that ministers enacted a outlawing on Palestine Action notwithstanding receiving warnings that such steps could “accidentally amplify” the group’s visibility, per leaked government documents.

The Situation

This advisory paper was prepared 90 days ahead of the legal outlawing of the group, which was established to engage in activism aimed at curb UK weapons exports to Israel.

This was prepared in March by personnel at the interior ministry and the local governance ministry, with input from counter-terrorism specialists.

Opinion Polling

Under the headline “How would the banning of the organisation be viewed by the UK public”, a part of the document warned that a ban could turn into a controversial matter.

Officials portrayed the group as a “modest single issue group with less mainstream media coverage” in contrast with other activist movements such as other climate groups. However, it observed that the organisation’s protests, and detentions of its members, gained media attention.

Experts stated that polling showed “rising frustration with IDF tactics in Gaza”.

Prior to its key argument, the briefing mentioned a survey indicating that a majority of Britons felt Israel had gone too far in the conflict in Gaza and that a like percentage supported a ban on weapons exports.

“These are viewpoints based on which the organization defines itself, campaigning directly to challenge the Israeli weapons trade in the UK,” officials wrote.

“If that PAG is proscribed, their profile may inadvertently be boosted, gaining backing among similarly minded members of the public who disagree with the British footprint in the the nation’s military exports.”

Further Concerns

Experts noted that the general populace were against demands from the rightwing media for strict measures, such as a outlawing.

Additional parts of the report referenced research indicating the population had a “general lack of awareness” regarding the group.

The document said that “a large portion of the citizens are likely at this time ignorant of Palestine Action and would stay that way if there is outlawing or, should they learn, would stay mostly indifferent”.

The outlawing under anti-terror legislation has led to protests where many individuals have been arrested for holding up placards in the streets saying “I reject atrocities, I back the group”.

This briefing, which was a community impact assessment, stated that a ban under terrorism laws could escalate religious frictions and be viewed as government partiality in toward Israel.

The document alerted ministers and top advisers that a ban could become “a trigger for significant debate and censure”.

Recent Events

Huda Ammori of the network, said that the report’s advisories had materialized: “Knowledge of the matters and support of the network have increased dramatically. This proscription has had the opposite effect.”

The home secretary at the time, the minister, declared the outlawing in the summer, immediately after the organization’s members supposedly committed acts at a military base in the region. Authorities asserted the harm was substantial.

The timing of the report shows the outlawing was in development ahead of it was revealed.

Officials were informed that a ban might be seen as an attack on individual rights, with the officials saying that certain people in government as well as the wider public may consider the measure as “a creep of security authorities into the realm of liberty and protest.”

Government Statements

A Home Office official said: “The group has engaged in an escalating campaign entailing criminal damage to the UK’s key installations, coercion, and alleged violence. Such behavior endangers the wellbeing of the citizens at danger.

“Rulings on outlawing are carefully considered. Decisions are guided by a comprehensive fact-driven procedure, with assistance from a broad spectrum of advisers from various departments, the law enforcement and the MI5.”

A counter-terrorism law enforcement representative commented: “Rulings concerning banning are a prerogative for the government.

“As the public would expect, national security forces, in conjunction with a variety of other agencies, regularly provide material to the interior ministry to aid their efforts.”

The report also disclosed that the Cabinet Office had been paying for monthly studies of public strain associated with Israel and Palestine.