🔗 Share this article

There have been times when Tory figureheads have seemed almost sensible outwardly – and different periods where they have come across as wildly irrational, yet continued to be cherished by their party. Currently, it's far from either of those times. Kemi Badenoch failed to inspire attendees when she addressed her conference, despite she presented the provocative rhetoric of border-focused rhetoric she assumed they wanted.

It’s not so much that they’d all woken up with a renewed sense of humanity; rather they didn’t believe she’d ever be able to implement it. It was, fake vegan meat. The party dislikes such approaches. One senior Conservative reportedly described it as a “themed procession”: loud, energetic, but still a farewell.

Coming Developments for this Party With a Decent Case to Make for Itself as the Most Historically Successful Political Organization in Modern Times?

Some are having renewed consideration at one contender, who was a hard “no” at the beginning – but as things conclude, and other candidates has left. Another group is generating a excitement around a rising star, a recently elected representative of the latest cohort, who presents as a Shires Tory while wallpapering her social media with border-control messaging.

Could she be the standard-bearer to counter opposition forces, now leading the Tories by a significant margin? Is there a word for beating your rivals by adopting their policies? And, assuming no phrase fits, surely we could borrow one from martial arts?

When Finding Satisfaction In Any of This, in a How-the-Mighty-Are-Fallen Way, in a Serves-Them-Right-for-Austerity Way, That Is Understandable – However Completely Irrational

It isn't necessary to look at the US to know this, or reference Daniel Ziblatt’s groundbreaking study, his analysis of political systems: all your cognitive processes is emphasizing it. Moderate conservatism is the crucial barrier resisting the extremist factions.

His research conclusion is that democracies survive by appeasing the “elite classes” happy. I’m not wild about it as an organising principle. It seems as though we’ve been keeping the propertied and powerful for ages, at the cost of everyone else, and they never seem sufficiently content to cease desiring to take a bite out of disability benefits.

But his analysis is not speculation, it’s an archival deep dive into the Weimar-era political organization during the Weimar Republic (combined with the British Conservatives circa 1906). Once centrist parties becomes uncertain, when it starts to pursue the terminology and gesture-based policies of the radical wing, it hands them the steering wheel.

There Were Examples Some of This During the Brexit Years

A key figure cosying up to an influential advisor was one particularly egregious example – but extremist sympathies has become so obvious now as to overshadow all remaining party narratives. Where are the traditional Tories, who prize stability, preservation, legal frameworks, the pride of Britain on the world stage?

What happened to the modernisers, who portrayed the country in terms of economic engines, not tension-filled environments? Don’t get me wrong, I didn't particularly support both groups either, but it’s absolutely striking how those worldviews – the broad-church approach, the modernizing wing – have been eliminated, in favour of relentless demonisation: of newcomers, Muslims, benefit claimants and demonstrators.

Appear at Podiums to Melodies Evoking the Theme Tune to the Television Drama

While discussing what they cannot stand for any more. They characterize demonstrations by 75-year-old pacifists as “displays of hostility” and display banners – national emblems, Saint George’s flags, any item featuring a vibrant national tones – as an open challenge to those questioning that complete national identity is the best thing a person could possibly be.

There doesn’t seem to be any inherent moderation, encouraging reassessment with fundamental beliefs, their historical context, their stated objectives. Whatever provocation the Reform leader offers them, they follow. Consequently, no, it isn't enjoyable to watch them implode. They are dragging democratic norms along in their decline.