🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.