🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin visited the South Asian nation four years ago, the global landscape looked entirely distinct. That short trip, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on discussions on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Months later, the full-scale invasion of its neighbor would turn the Russian leader into a global pariah, greatly limiting his diplomatic travel.

Furthermore, that period came before a significant shift in US-India relations, marked by contentious statements and the imposition of heavy trade tariffs.

"In this context, the significance of this diplomatic mission to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of resilient relations and a rejection of outside coercion," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Both Nations

The summit occurs at a delicate moment. President Putin comes following rejecting recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, bolstered by reported advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the key significance of this engagement is its very occurrence," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It suggests a movement toward something resembling normal international relations."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are even higher. The country faces a challenging geopolitical climate, characterized by a less engaged United States, a weakened Russia, and an assertive China.

The tightrope walk was underscored just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats released a joint opinion piece questioning Russia's peace efforts. This elicited a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an unacceptable diplomatic practice.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The historical partnership originates from the Cold War era and is deeply entrenched, with Moscow long being Delhi's primary defense supplier. This alliance was generally accepted by the West until a recent shift.

Over time, Western nations ignored India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. However, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, accusations mounted, leading to economic penalties and a major chill in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"Consequently, India has returned to its traditional posture of 'hedging'," explained a foreign policy expert. "It signals to the US that it has alternatives and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Apart from global diplomacy, India's fundamental concern with Russia is its strategic location. "China continues to be the greatest threat to India, and historically, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst added.

The strengthening partnership between Russia and China has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its adversary and its longtime partner.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to diversify its defense procurement, decreasing its dependence on Russian equipment from a dominant share to under 40% in the past few years.

"India will attempt to strike a balance: purchase enough Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but avoid overly reliant that a supply disruption would leave it vulnerable," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Increased economic cooperation is likely to be a key agenda item. The Russian leader has publicly emphasized plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of energy purchases remains pivotal. Although the Indian government has stated to keep buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have slowed activity from the commercial buyers. Simultaneously, India has moved to boost imports of American oil and gas.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "hurdles" in economic cooperation but said it would continue without major disruption. The official downplayed the impact of sanctions, stating they would cause only "insignificant" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to circumvent them.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be mentioned primarily through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader has access to all parties, the nation lacks the necessary leverage to significantly influence the war," the analyst said. "Beyond encouraging talks, its ability to make a difference is constrained."

In the end, despite the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," driven by national interest in a rapidly changing world.